Vayechi 5785

[Print]

Forgiveness consequences[1]

ויצוו אל-יוסף לאמר אביך צוה לפני מותו לאמר: כה-תאמרו ליוסף אנא שא נא פשע אחיך וחטאתם כי-רעה גמולך ועתה שא נא לפשע עבדי אלקי אביך ויבק יוסף בדברם אליו
[The brothers] commanded Yosef, saying: “Your father commanded before his death, saying: ‘Thus shall you say to Yosef: Please forgive the iniquity of your brothers, and their sins, for they have bestowed bad upon you. Now, please forgive the iniquity of the servants of the G-d of your father’” Yosef wept as they spoke to them[2]

We find that the brothers asked Yosef to forgive them for selling him into slavery. Although Yosef cried at their request, we don’t find explicitly that he forgave them. We know that even if someone repents for the wrong they’ve done to their friend, if the friend doesn’t forgive the sin isn’t fully atoned[3]. If Yosef never forgave them, that means the brothers died without the proper atonement. As a result, our Sages tell us[4] that the ten famous Sages who were martyred by the Romans, known as the Asara Harugei Malchus, including giants like Rabbi Akiva, were reincarnations of the ten sons of Yaakov[5]. They were brutally killed in order to provide the necessary atonement for the sin of selling Yosef[6].

However, Sefer Chassidim understands[7] that Yosef indeed forgave the brothers[8]. It writes that someone who is truly pious is someone who is able to overcome their middos as be forgiving. Yosef is given as the prime example. How then can we understand why were the brothers punished with reincarnating as the Asara Harugei Malchus? The Chida suggests[9] that the brothers sinned doubly. Although they sinned against Yosef and he forgave them, they also sinned against Hashem. The sale of Yosef became a public scandal, known to the Egyptians and Pharaoh. This created a terrible Chillul Hashem. Their teshuva wasn’t enough to fully undo the blemish, and they needed further atonement.

Although, Rav Elyashiv is quoted[10] as bringing an explicit gemarra against the Sefer Chassidim. We see that Yosef didn’t end up forgiving his brothers. What’s the proof? The gemarra in Yoma teaches us[11] that if one needs to seek forgiveness for the wrongdoing he did to his friend, he only needs to ask them three times. The gemarra derives this from our verse with the brothers asking Yosef for forgiveness. There, there’s three expressions requesting forgiveness. If Yosef indeed forgave them, what’s the proof? Maybe they stopped after three times because he forgave them! It must be that he didn’t forgive them, and nevertheless they didn’t need to ask more than three times[12].

Why wouldn’t Yosef forgive the brothers? They were clearly remorseful for what they had done. Yosef even said that only good came from their terrible deed[13]. Some suggest[14] that for the pain and suffering he endured, Yosef surely forgave them. However, one thing was beyond forgiveness. The Torah that Yosef learned from his father Yaakov was so precious to him. All those years of learning with him that were lost can never be replaced. They were of infinite value, and he was thus unable to forgive them for that[15].

Good Shabbos

[1] Based on a devar Torah heard from Rav Yitzchak Horowitz of Givat HaMivtar

[2] Genesis 50:16-17

[3] Bava Kamma 92a

[4] Zohar Chadash Eicha, p. 37; Midrash Mishlei 1:13

[5] Ten, because Yosef obviously didn’t sell himself, and Binyamin wasn’t culpable. A question that is asked is that Reuven also wasn’t culpable, as he wasn’t complicit in the sale. Several answers have been proposed. Zohar Chadash loc. cit. says that Reuven reincarnated into Rabbi Eliezer HaGadol, who wasn’t actually killed, but merely imprisoned. This implies that the name Asara Harugei Malchus isn’t literal. However, Benei Yissaschar Chodesh Tishrei § 12 explains that even though Reuven’s reincarnation was spared, the other brothers were reincarnated into ten. Either he means the 9 were somehow divided into 10, or either Binyamin or Yosef are somehow also held accountable. Yalkut Reuveni to Genesis 37:8 first suggests that Reuven was punished for moving Yaakov’s bed, and then cites Sha’ar HaGilgulim Hakdma § 31 and Chessed L’Avraham Ein Mishpat, Nahar § 25 that Yosef was punished for inciting the brothers to hate him

[6] Rabbeinu Bachaye to Genesis loc. cit.

[7] Sefer Chassidim § 11

[8] This is also explicit in Midrash Tehillim § 10

[9] Bris Olam to Sefer Chassidim loc. cit.

[10] Rav Horowitz cited this from Rav Elyashiv. I also found it in MiShulchan Rav Eliyahu Baruch to v. 17. Interestingly, He’aros Rav Elyashiv to Yoma 87a brings an interpretation that Yosef immediately forgave his brothers, yet we see from their triple expression that this is all this necessary to ask. Maharsha ad. loc. says the same. See also Chashukei Chemed to Niddah 31b, where Rav Zilberstein brings himself Yoma 87a as a proof for a related teaching of his father-in-law Rav Elyashiv, that even after asking for forgiveness three times, the person isn’t necessarily exempt from further atonement. We see the brothers were indeed punished, even though they did their due diligence of asking for forgiveness

[11] Yoma 87a

[12] Cf. Maharsha ad. loc.

[13] Ibid v. 20

[14] Rav Horowitz cited this from Rav Mordechai Tzuckerman, in the name of the Chofetz Chaim. I saw that MiShulchan Rav Eliyahu Baruch loc. cit. also cited this from Rav Tzuckerman

[15] MiShulchan Rav Eliyahu Baruch remains at a loss how Yosef could be cruel to his brothers when halacha requires him to be forgiving. Rav Aryeh Leib Shteinman in Ayeles HaShachar ad. loc. suggests instead that while Yosef wanted to forgive them, it was beyond his present abilities. Rav Shteinman cites a related story of Rav Eliyahu Lopian who, when asked for forgiveness, asked for a couple of weeks so he could ensure the forgiveness was completely sincere

Shevii shel Pesach 5783

[Print]

Recalling the Exodus[1]

…למען תזכר את-יום צאתך מארץ מצרים כל ימי חייך‏
…In order for you to remember the day you left Egypt, all the days of your life[2]

Besides the Festival of Pesach, where we recount the Exodus at the Seder, there is an obligation to recall the Exodus from Egypt every day[3]. We fulfill this by saying the third paragraph of Shema both day and night[4], which mentions the Exodus. Now, the Magen Avraham innovates[5] that reciting Shiras HaYam, the Song at Sea that the Jews sang when the Reed Sea split, fulfills this obligation. Now, at first glance, this seems a little surprising. The Song at Sea was recited after the Exodus from Egypt. Why would reciting it be considered recalling the Exodus? The Torah indeed says[6] to recall the day we left Egypt, and the Sea split a week later[7]. Furthermore, the Midrash says that part of the obligation of recalling the Exodus is to recall the final plague of the death of the first born. If one didn’t say it, they haven’t fulfilled their obligation[8].

Continue reading “Shevii shel Pesach 5783”

Bo 5783

[Print]

Problematic pascal prohibitions[1]

בבית אחד יאכל לא-תוציא מן-הבית מן-הבשר חוצה ועצם לא תשברו-בו
It shall be eaten in one house. Don’t take from the meat from the house to outside. And don’t break a bone from it[2]

This week’s parsha introduces the mitzvah of the korbon Pesach, the Passover offering. It was to be prepared and consumed in a very specific way. There are thus many mitzvos associated with the korbon Pesach. One of them is the meat from the offering had to be consumed in one house, and it was prohibited to even take it outside. Another mitzvah is that one wasn’t allowed to break the bones of the Pesach offering, for example to get to the marrow inside. These two mitzvos are written in the same verse, but for some reason there’s an inconsistency. The prohibition to not take the meat outside is written in the singular (תוציא); one shouldn’t do it. However, the prohibition to not break the bones is written in in the plural, speaking to many people (תשברו). Why are they written differently?

Continue reading “Bo 5783”